GST India Forum – Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India › Forums › Bare Law › Sec 81 – Transfer of property to be void in certain cases
- CA Ashish BadalaModeratorApril 14, 2017 at 11:27 AMPost count: 184Topics: 181
Been thanked: 5 times
Where a person, after any amount has become due from him, creates a charge on or parts with the property belonging to him or in his possession by way of sale, mortgage, exchange, or any other mode of transfer whatsoever of any of his properties in favour of any other person with the intention of defrauding the Government revenue, such charge or transfer shall be void as against any claim in respect of any tax or any other sum payable by the said person:
Provided that, such charge or transfer shall not be void if it is made for adequate consideration, in good faith and without notice of the pendency of such proceedings under this Act or without notice of such tax or other sum payable by the said person, or with the previous permission of the proper officer.Priya MadrechaModeratorMay 23, 2017 at 1:01 PMPost count: 280Topics: 4
Been thanked: 1 time
This provision is for protecting the Government revenue by avoiding transfer of property by a taxable person to another person. This would prevent any attempt to defraud the revenue by alienating the properties.
(i) The said provision would be applicable only when any tax has become due.
(ii) The following acts done by a person, in favour of any another person, after the tax becomes due, would be void
Situations / cases – Void Situations / cases – valid
• Creates a charge on; or
• Parts with the property
• Belonging to him; or
• In his possession
By way of sale, mortgage, exchange, or any other mode of transfer whatsoever of any of his properties. Made for adequate consideration and
• without notice of the pendency of proceeding
• Without notice of such tax or other sum payable by the said person,
• With previous permission of the proper officer.
(iii) The transfer will be void, when it is or was with an intention of defrauding the Government revenue.
1. Mr. Defrauder was served with a notice of demand for Rs. 20 Lakhs on 10th June 2018. He filed a reply for the said notice on 20th June 2018, stating that he was unable to deposit tax dues as he was financially stressed. On 15th June 2018, Mr. Defrauder transferred all the property worthRs.35 Lakhs under his name to the name of his wife for a consideration of Rs.10,000/-. Is this act of Mr. Defrauder valid?
As per section 81, the said transfer would be void and the property worthRs.35 Lakhs would be considered still to be in the hands of Mr. Defrauders.
2. In the above illustration, if transfer of property was for a consideration of Rs. 42 Lakhs to Mr. X who is unaware of the pending proceedings of Mr. Defrauder. The transfer took place on 15th June 2018. Is the act of Mr. Defrauder valid?
In this case the transaction would be a valid act, since the transfer was made for adequate consideration and also without notice of the pendency of proceeding.
3. On Mr. Perfect, notice was issued on 10th June 2018; however the same was received by Mr. Perfect on 20th June, 2018. Meanwhile the property of Mr. Perfect was sold to Mr. Perfectionist for Rs. 35 Crore. Is the sale void or valid?
The sale is valid since on the date of sale there was no pending proceeding on Mr. Perfect.
81.3 Comparative review
This provision is new to Indirect Tax law. It is a concept borrowed from the Income-Tax law to safeguard the revenue. According to the Income Tax (I-T) Act, certain transfers can be considered void without a tax-clearance certificate (Section 281B). “This can be transfer of immovable property, that is, sale or mortgage of housing property, any gift, or exchange,”
81.4 Related provisions
All the provisions which are in relation to assessment and determination of tax would be applicable. The same is Provided below:
62 Assessment of non-filers of returns
63 Assessment of unregistered persons
64 Summary assessment in certain special cases
73 Determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit
wrongly availed or utilized for any reason other than fraud or any wilful misstatement or suppression of facts
74 Determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized by reason of fraud or any wilful-misstatement or suppression of facts
Q1. When the transaction in property is void as per section 81?
Ans. During the pendency of proceeding under GST Act, if the taxable person transfers the property of his to another person with an intent of defrauding the Government revenue, then such transfer would be considered as void.
Q1. Charge on which of the following is void during pending of proceedings,
(a) Parts with the property belonging to him
(b) Creates a charge on Property
(c) Parts with the property in his possession
(d) both (a) and (b)
Ans. (d) both (a) and (b)
Q2. What all modes of transfers are covered under section 81?
(d) All of the above
Ans. (d) All of the above
Q3. When the transfer of property would be considered as void ……………..
(a) Transaction is done to defraud the Govt. revenue
(b) Transaction is done without intention to defraud the Govt. revenue
(c) Any of the above
Ans. Transaction is done to defraud the Govt. revenue
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.